How could we combine Duhigg, McKibben, and Moore’s methods for social change to create the most effective way to help slow down climate change?

The three methods proposed by Charles Duhigg, Bill McKibben, and Kathleen Moore all have different strategies that they believe will provide the best avenue towards change. Duhigg believes in the weak ties of mankind and how those provide the best ways for people to connect and create change. Bill McKibben on the other hand, believes in scientific facts and how being blunt and honest about what we are doing to the world, primarily oil companies, is what we need to be aware of and focus on changing. Finally, Kathleen Moore talks about moral obligations both to ourselves and to the future generations. She wants people to change their ways based on emotion and morals instead of the facts of what is changing and by how much. Moore also is set on the fact that we all obviously understand the damages being done, so by focusing on the facts, it will not work. It has not worked before so what is different now. By claiming that only one person’s method is the dominant one or the one that will work the best is like saying that everyone thinks the same and will react the same. This is not the case, which is why a combination is the best approach due to the different ways of life that the people of the globe have.